Sort of. But not the same way most Christians do. Interestingly, while Jewish people are often intensely interested in the historical accuracy of (or inaccuracies in) the Exodus account, the literal truth of it is not a sort of religious requirement as in most forms of Christianity.

I have personally witnessed religiously observant Jewish folks engage passionately in historical debate with some people at the table taking the position that parts or all of the written account are wrong — taking for granted that this is not a religious problem.

The historical accuracy of any particular part of the Torah matters to Jewish people but not so much as a requirement of faith practices.

The Jewish people who argue that the Exodus stories in the Torah are wholly or partly inaccurate are not treated or thought of as heretics or betrayers of the faith, not by most Jewish people in any case.

In my experience, Jewish people in general are quite comfortable with the idea that parts of the Torah are myth, and quite happy to argue (even heatedly) about which parts, without having that becoming stigmatizing or excluding. Nobody says, you must believe this bit or that bit is historical or you're a bad Jew.

In fairness, much the same can be said about progressive Christians too, who tend to treat the historical accuracy of the Bible as irrelevant their faith practices.