Not to mention leaving out the rather pertinent detail that Stock was in no way forced to resign. She had tenure and the actual stated support of university hierarchy to exercise her academic freedom.

Nor was the campus routinely disrupted or shut down by vigorous protest, despite the fact that a few protests did happen.

Stock's classes were very unpopular, because students, like the ones you imply above, appear not interested in wasting their time in the anti-trans discourse Stock is so fascinated with.

Yet, even with undergrads signing up to take classes from other professors instead of from Stock, and with graduate students preferring different academic advisors, Stock could have stayed on at Sussex for the rest of her career on full salary, publishing to her heart's content and teaching anyone willing to take a class from her.

That's persecution?

I'd say that's just another example of her incoherent arguments.