If CBD is effective and safe for treatment of certain illnesses in humans and animals, then why isn’t it being approved and distributed through traditional medical and veterinary channels?

Why should people who believe in science and the regulatory process think that articles like yours are not marketing hype or conspiracy theory?

I believe that if CBD were safe and effective for treatment of illnesses in human beings, then trained physicians and pharmaceutical companies would begin processes to make treatment available.

We would see FDA applications and similar initiatives backed by studies and other empirical data.

Instead, what we see is people on the internet talking about how good CBD is.

And now animals too?

Something here feels very off. Dr Jeff Livingston , can you comment on the situation?